![]() However, the government in no way orchestrated such alleged voluntary interactions," prosecutors wrote.ĭefense lawyers didn’t name the informant in their court filing, but said it is somebody who served as an informant for the government from April 2021 through at least January 2023, though the original contact dated back to 2019. "That certain defendants or defense counsel chose to communicate with the (confidential human source) about matters related to this prosecution is a decision made by them. Capitol and their families, including by assisting in fundraising efforts and protesting against their conditions of confinement,” prosecutors wrote.īut investigators “intentionally chose to never ask” the informant about the person's relationship with Tarrio or any other defendants or lawyers involved in the case, they said. Prosecutors said the FBI was “generally aware” that the informant was "active in assisting defendants charged with crimes related to the Januattack on the U.S. Tarrio, a Miami resident, served as national chairman for the far-right extremist group, whose members describe it as a politically incorrect men’s club for “Western chauvinists.” He and the other Proud Boys could face up to 20 years in prison if convicted of seditious conspiracy. Tarrio, Rehl and three other Proud Boys - Joseph Biggs, Ethan Nordean and Dominic Pezzola - are charged with seditious conspiracy for what prosecutors allege was a plot to block the transfer of presidential power from Donald Trump to Biden after the 2020 election. 6 attack that halted Congress' certification of President Joe Biden’s victory, sent lawmakers running and left dozens of police officers injured. It’s the latest twist in the trial, which is one of the most serious to emerge from the Jan. “I've lost confidence in the process,” said Norman Pattis, who said the informant had more than two dozen calls with his client, including about legal issues. The informant also had defense contacts, including sending a “constant drumbeat” of unsolicited messages to one lawyer and recommended potential witnesses to another. The informant had been set to testify for former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio and had met with his lawyers in preparation for testimony. “From our point of view, this is alarming, shocking, troublesome,” Hernandez, who is representing Proud Boy Zachary Rehl, during an emergency hearing on the matter held after the judge canceled testimony for the day. The revelation came Wednesday when defense lawyer Carmen Hernandez said in court papers that the defense team was told by prosecutors that afternoon that the witness they were planning to call to the stand on the next day had been a government informant. They called suggestions of government misconduct “baseless.” The government only found out from the defense team that the informant had been communicating with the defense and had participated in “prayer meetings” with relatives of at least one of the Proud Boys on trial, prosecutors said. District Judge Timothy Kelly said there's no clear evidence of wrongdoing by the government and allowed the trial to continue Friday, but is also set to hear additional arguments about how deeply enmeshed the informant was with the case. The FBI ended its relationship with the informant this past January after it learned that the person had received a subpoena to testify, an agent said in an affidavit filed in court. WASHINGTON – As revelations that a defense witness was also an FBI informant roil the already contentious Capitol riot trial of members of the far-right Proud Boys group, prosecutors said Thursday that the informant was never told to gather information about the defendants or their lawyers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |